Best Practice: Creating an Effective Benchmarking Practice

Ten or even five years ago, the industry used to look at an entire book of business and compare it to a single insured, which was like comparing apples with oranges. This meant results failed to consider the complex environment in which an individual insured was operating.
 

For example, this method meant that a retail client might have perceived their program as performing well without understanding whether they were being compared against retailers or other insured types operating in different states with different regulations.  

This example retailer might then be very surprised when their operating and claim costs continue to rise and injuries go beyond the trending data. This lack of insight into the individual factors influencing an insured meant that many opportunities to improve and refine programs were likely missed. 

Here at Gallagher Bassett, we could see how this was impacting the carriers we worked with, and we developed a predictive analytics algorithm to slice and dice data to provide meaningful insights to improve claim programs. 

I worked with our team to develop SMART Benchmarking, which stands for Severity Mix Adjusted Rating Technique. This algorithm allows us to access the full spectrum of data available to our clients and compare and analyze it to understand exactly how they can compete in such a challenging market.  

SMART allows our claims professionals and carrier clients to compare a file in a truly apples-to-apples manner. We can help you understand the severity, costs, treatment recommendations, and other factors that will help you resolve a claim and move on to the next file.  

While many carriers are using predictive analytics algorithms, these can have varying effectiveness, so we always encourage carriers to ask themselves these three questions: 

1. Do we know the complexity of our own claims and how that’s trending over time? 

2. Do we know the complexity of the benchmark set we’re using to compare ourselves against? 

3. Do we understand the expected result the product or service can offer us? And, is that result truly meaningful for our business goals? 

 

I’ve included more information about our recommended approach in the short video below, but if you have any questions about benchmarking in your organization – please don’t hesitate to reach out. 

More Posts

Insights

MGA Market Pulse: Key Insights for 2026

Earlier this year, Gallagher Bassett’s (GB) Carrier Practice conducted our first MGA Insights survey to uncover the challenges and opportunities facing MGAs, MGUs, program administrators (PAs), and carriers. The results are in, and the key areas of focus include acquiring talent, leveraging AI, improving service quality, and addressing challenges in claims management and premium growth.

Read more
Insights

Looking Ahead at the Top 3 Challenges Facing Carriers in 2026

The Carrier Perspective: 2026 Claims Insights will be released early next year, providing data-rich insights and invaluable takeaways to help carriers focus for the year ahead. With early results of our 2026 Claims Insights survey showing clear signs of the top challenges on carriers’ minds, our team explores what has changed since the 2025 Claims Insights whitepaper and what carriers need to be prepared for in 2026.

Read more
Media

AI Can Nix Bias, but Humans Can Help Too

Does AI have a role in bringing equity to workers’ compensation claims? For Nikki Jackson, Head of Learning Strategy and Emerging Talent, a human touch in tandem with AI’s vestaile capabilities is still required for the foreseeable future.

Read more

Keep your finger on the pulse of the latest industry news and insights.

Sign up to our monthly newsletter today.

Search

Hi there!

Want to drop us a line?  You can get in touch by filling out the form below and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible!